Manual Testing Vs Automation Testing

Manual Testing Vs Automation Testing

Manual Testing :
Manual testing is the way toward testing the product physically to discover the deformities. Analyzer ought to have the point of view of an end client and to guarantee every one of the highlights are functioning as specified in the necessity archive. In this procedure, analyzers execute the experiments and create the reports physically without utilizing any computerization devices.

Advantages :

1-Manual testing should be possible on a wide range of utilizations. 

2-It is ideal for short life cycle items. 

3-Recently outlined experiments ought to be executed physically. 

4-Application must be tried physically before it is mechanized. 

5-It is favored in the activities where the prerequisites change as often as possible and for the items where the GUI changes always. 

6-It is less expensive regarding introductory speculation contrasted with Automation testing. 

7-It requires less time and cost to start beneficial manual testing. 

8-It enables analyzer to perform adhoc testing .

9-There is no need to the analyzer to have learning on Automation Tools.

Disadvantages:

1-Manual Testing is tedious principally while doing relapse testing. 

2-Costly finished mechanization testing over the long haul.

Automation Testing :
Computerization testing is the way toward testing the product utilizing a robotization devices to discover the imperfections. In this procedure, executing the test contents and producing the outcomes are performed consequently via computerization instruments. Some most famous instruments to do mechanization testing are HP QTP/UFT, Selenium WebDriver, and so forth.

Advantages:
1-Computerization testing is speedier in execution. 

2-It is less expensive contrasted with manual testing in a long run. 

3-Computerized testing is more solid. 

4-Computerized testing is all the more capable and flexible. 

5-It is for the most part utilized for relapse testing. 

6-It doesn't require human mediation.

Disadvantages:
1-It is prescribed just for stable items. 

2-Robotization testing is costly at first. 

3-A large portion of the robotization instruments are costly. 

4-It has a few restrictions, for example, taking care of captcha, text styles, shading. 

5-Tremendous support if there should be an occurrence of rehashed changes in the prerequisites. 

6-Not every one of the devices bolster a wide range of testing. For example, windows, web, versatility, execution/stack testing.